I am just what the Doctor Ordered! Call me NOW!

13/10/12 0 COMMENTS

Cool weather is coming. Have you been feeling bad lately? Need some TLC?? Nurse Eva is here to firmly make you feel better. Very Through Physical Examinations with deep anal exams. A little KY Jelly can make all your ills go away!

Niteflirt accepts all Major Credit Cards! Plus Debit Cards and Money Gift Cards with the Visa and Mastercard logo on them.

ext: 9439577 or

Call Button


Great Wig Website for My Sissies and TS Girls

07/04/12 0 COMMENTS

My girls are always complaining that they cannot find pretty wigs.

Well check out this site! http://www.gorgeoushairwigs.com/

They have a lot of styles and varying price ranges. Starting out, you don’t have to pay $600.00 for a wig. Just get something fun and pretty!

Mistress Eva
99 Cents per minute!
Feminization Line: 1-800-863-5478 ext: 9443543 or
Call Button

Chastity Lovers! Try Dreamlover ChronoVault!

07/04/12 0 COMMENTS

This is the Ultimate Chastity Management Solution! I would love for my Chastity sluts to do this! Then I would not have to worry about losing the keys in the mail. Also I would know the key is secure.


The only time-lock safe designed for male chastity training and progressive deacclimation.

Full internet control from any standards-compliant PC or mobile browser.

Tamper evident: no external fasteners, sturdy construction, unauthorized opening requires time-consuming device destruction.

Lightweight, portable
Integrates with the DreamLover Male Training courses
Scriptable / programmable

Only $499 USD (376 EUR, 314 GBP)

Benefits for single males

Control energy wasting addictions
Reclaim your productive time
Have more energy to channel into constructive activities
Practice Sex Transmutation
Jump-start your training, advertise* your results and attract a suitable companion

A Study in the Obvious! Effects of penis size in gay community

20/07/11 0 COMMENTS

From: “Woodhull’s Sexual Freedom eNews”
Date: July 19, 2011 7:14:38 AM EDT
To: Newslist
Subject: [wff-newslist] NIH-backed study examined effects of penis size in gay community
Reply-To: wff-newslist@lists.wff-lists.org

NIH-Backed Study Examined Effects of Penis Size in Gay Community

By Judson Berger

Published July 18, 2011 | FoxNews.com

The federal government helped fund a study that examined what effect a gay man’s penis size has on his sex life and general well-being.

The study was among several backed by the National Institutes of Health that have come under scrutiny from a group claiming the agency is wasting valuable tax dollars at a time when the country is trying to control its debt. This particular research resulted in a 2009 report titled, “The Association Between Penis Size and Sexual Health Among Men Who Have Sex with Men.”

The study reported, among its findings, that gay men with “below average penises” were more likely to assume a “bottom” sexual position, while those with “above average penises” were more likely to assume a “top” sexual position. Those with average penises identified themselves as “versatile” in the bedroom.

Though it’s difficult to trace exactly how much federal funding went to the project, the study was one of many linked to an $899,769 grant in 2006. The grant was administered by NIH’s National Institute on Drug Abuse, and went first to a group called Public Health Solutions and a researcher with the National Development and Research Institutes before going to individual researchers.

Those researchers then compiled data from a survey of more than 1,000 gay and bisexual men at events in New York City for the gay community.

“This country is broke and we cannot spend money on this kind of stuff,” said Andrea Lafferty, president of the Traditional Values Coalition, which drew attention to the report as part of a six-month investigation into NIH grants for examples of “institutional waste.”

“We’re spending money on wacky stuff,” Lafferty said.

But one of the researchers involved with the report told FoxNews.com that NIH funding was only used to help “analyze and write up” data that had already been collected without the use of taxpayer funds.

“The data were not collected using taxpayer funds,” Jeffrey Parsons, a professor with Hunter College, said in an email. “NIH funds were not used to measure anyone’s penis size.”

He said part of the 2006 grant went toward the primary author’s post-survey analysis as part of his postdoctoral fellowship to “better inform sexual health promotion efforts.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/18/nih-backed-study-examined-effects-penis-size-in-gay-community/#ixzz1SUqvPubt

Full article at: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/07/18/nih-backed-study-examined-effects-penis-size-in-gay-community/
Read the latest news at Woodhull Sexual Freedom Alliance

Follow us on Twitter: @WoodhullSFA

Friend us on Facebook: Woodhull Sexual Freedom Alliance

I personally hate when huge amounts of money are used to fund the study of the obvious. This is one of those cases. I am a Bi-Sexual Female and I even knew this! Look, penis sizes matters no matter what your sexual orientation is. It just does. If my girlfriend is going to fuck me with a strap on, do you think I would want 5 inches or 10 inches? You’re damn right! Ten inches baby! When I am using a strapon on a newbie, I go small and work him up to a 10 incher! Why? Because it feels good that way! Yes, big cocks look more powerful too! Plus they usually ejaculate more too. There is something down right primal about it. So let’s just say it, “SIZE DOES MATTER!”

Mistress Eva

Are Men What They Used to Be?

20/07/11 1 COMMENTS

Dr. Peggy Drexler. Author, ‘Our Fathers Ourselves. Daughters, Fathers, And The Changing American Family’

Every study, it seems, brings another assault on the masculinity of the American man.

As I read about how men are thinking more like women, and women are filling the space vacated by declining masculinity, I have to wonder: Is it a shift in gender roles, or an easing of expectations?

In other words are we seeing men and women as they always were, but were never allowed to be?

Those in the men-are-the-new-women camp point to what they see as troubling evidence. Early this year there was much buzz in the halls of gender behavior when a study of 5,000 American adults found that more men are interested in attachment and commitment, while more women wanted to preserve some of their independence in a relationship.

There were other findings that sounded alarms about the manliness of men. Half of single men 21 to 35 wanted kids, where for women in that age group, the number was 46 percent — not exactly a statistical landslide, but apparently troubling none-the-less.

Adding circumstantial evidence of de-masculation is the growth of men’s cosmetics, waxing, and fashion. Now this: SPANX, a company founded to fight panty lines, tummy bulge and bra fat — reports that one of their hottest new products last year was SPANX for men.

There is more. But across all of it, interpretations range from interested observation to predictions of the matriarchical decline experienced by civilizations past. But at the core: there is the fear that America is becoming a less manly place. I heard nothing, for example, about the hard-nosed warriors in the U.S. women’s soccer team that spoke to bad things happening to females.

But as we pine for the macho man and alpha male, let’s also look at some additional evidence of the changing American man.

Dr. Warren Farrell, the author of the book Father and Child Reunion, points to the growing desire of dads to be a bigger part of their children’s lives. This new paternal involvement, he writes, “is to the twenty-first century what women’s desire to be in the workplace was to the twentieth century.”

A 2007 survey by the employment website Monster.com found that 70 percent of fathers would consider being a stay at home parent if money were no object. Almost 50 percent of dads of school aged children took paternity leave when their employer offered it.

The evidence is also accumulating in smaller increments. Men are free to hug more, they help with homework, they listen more, and — especially with daughters — are part of their lives in ways long denied to fathers of earlier generations. Is it feminization that has brought fathers so far from the distant, silent providers of the past?

Pick any organization, and you’ll find awareness, backed by shifts in culture, that the days of the my-way-or-the-highway manager are past. Is it feminization to realize that leadership by brute force of title must be replaced by the so-called “soft skills” of communication, cooperation and engagement?

While some wail over the declining state of manhood implied by the statistics, there is also the very real possibility that men are evolving from swaggering through life in some cartoon interpretation of what men are supposed to be — to becoming more fully-formed human beings free to find out what they can be.

So here is the question: are men less masculine, or more liberated? Are they being feminized, or humanized?


So are men becoming more sensitive, humanized or feminized? Every man has his own story. I will not lump all men into one happy package. What I can comment on is how many requests I* get for Feminization Sessions. I have certainly seen a increased interest in Feminization. Also the Bulk of the callers I get on Niteflirt are into Feminization, Cuckolding and Small Penis Humiliation. I find that many men are realizing that they do not want to be the sterotypical “real man” anymore. Many men I talk to would rather Worship a Strong Dominant Woman.

I do not know if this makes them weaker or maybe in fact stronger and more couragous. It takes balls to go against the customs and peer pressure of modern society. It takes strength to be emotionally available.

So what do you think?

Mistress Eva

 Page 1 of 2  1  2 »